Skip to main content
Main navigation
Home
Resource Exchange Library
Curated Guidance
Curated Guidance
Explaining the Curated Guidance
Air Quality Monitoring
Source Attribution
Emissions Inventory
Health Impact Assessment
Sustainable Development Benefits Assessment
Decision Support
Public Engagement and Communication
Legal Framework, Policy Design and Implementation
Why Take Action
Get Involved
About
English
Language
Sort: item-selected
Sort:
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Alphabetically, A-Z
Alphabetically, Z-A
Relevance
Breadcrumb
Home
Resource Exchange Library
Sources of ambient PM2.5 exposure in 96 global cities
Sources of ambient PM2.5 exposure in 96 global cities
Share
SHARE
Facebook share
Twitter
LinkedIn
Copy URL
Email
Download
Year of Publishing
2022
Authors
Tessum et al.
Tags
Language
English
AQM Activity Type
Source Attribution
Resource type
Scientific publications
Regions
Global
Governance level
Subnational
Description
To improve air quality, knowledge of the sources and locations of air pollutant emissions is critical. However, for many global cities, no previous estimates exist of how much exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5), the largest environmental cause of mortality, is caused by emissions within the city vs. outside its boundaries. We use the Intervention Model for Air Pollution (InMAP) global-through-urban reduced complexity air quality model with a high-resolution, global inventory of pollutant emissions to quantify the contribution of emissions by source type and location for 96 global cities. Among these cities, we find that the fraction of PM2.5 exposure caused by within-city emissions varies widely (μ = 37%; σ = 22%) and is not well-explained by surrounding population density. The list of most-important sources also varies by city. Compared to a more mechanistically detailed model, InMAP predicts urban measured concentrations with lower bias and error but also lower correlation. Predictive accuracy in urban areas is not particularly high with either model, suggesting an opportunity for improving global urban air emission inventories. We expect the results herein can be useful as a screening tool for policy options and, in the absence of available resources for further analysis, to inform policy action to improve public health.